Archive for February 2nd, 2009
Top 10 causes of dog poisoning
The ASPCA’s Animal Poison Control Center has put together a list of the top ten poisons that affected dogs in 2008.
1. Human medications. For several years, human medications have been number one source of poisoning cases — both prescriptions and over-the-counter drugs. Pets often snatch pill vials from counters and nightstands or gobble up medications accidentally dropped on the floor. Keep them in cabinets.
2. Insecticides. Bug control products rank number two, and many of them involved misuse of flea and tick products—such as applying the wrong topical treatment to the wrong species. Check with your vet before beginning any flea and tick control program.
3. People food. Grapes, raisins, avocado, onions and certain citrus fruit can harm dogs. One of the worst offenders is chocolate, which, if ingested in significant amounts, can cause vomiting, diarrhea, panting, excessive thirst, urination, hyperactivity, and in severe cases, abnormal heart rhythm, tremors and seizures.
4. Rat and mouse poisons. Last year, the ASPCA received approximately 8,000 calls about pets who had accidentally ingested rat and mouse poisons. Many baits used to attract rodents contain inactive ingredients that are attractive to pets as well. Ingesting them can lead to life-threatening problems for pets, including bleeding, seizures and kidney damage.
Posted by jwoestendiek February 2nd, 2009 under Muttsblog.
Tags: animal poison control center, animals, aspca, avocado, azalea, bleaches, cats, causes, chemicals, cleaners, detergents, dogs, fertilizer, flea, grapes, health, hotline, house plants, insecticides, lead, list, medicine, mercury, mouse poison, pets, poison, poisons, raisins, rat poison, rhododendron, tick, top ten, toxic, veterinarian, veterinary, vets, zinc
Comments: 3
Dogs getting dumber, researcher says
Purebred dogs are getting dumber and less agile because of the focus by breeders on appearance, scientists in Sweden say.
According to a report in the London Telegraph, the researchers say the change has taken place over the course of just a few generations.
While 19th century dogs were selected for breeding based on their strength and skills — such as guarding homes, retrieving quarry or watching over livestock — today’s dogs are more likely to be chosen strictly for their appearance. As a result, the researchers say, the are less responsive to commands and not as alert or attentive.
“Modern breeding practices are affecting the behavior and mental abilities of pedigree breeds as well as their physical features,” said Kenth Svartberg, an ethologist from Stockholm University and author of the research report.
Dr. Svartberg tested 13,000 dogs on characteristics such as sociability and curiosity to help him rate 31 different breeds. He found that those bred for appearance, and especially for shows, displayed reduced ability levels. He also found that attractive appearance was often linked with introversion and a boring personality.
The worst affected working breeds were smooth collies, once a herding dog, and Rhodesian ridgebacks, which were used for hunting.
(Image from My Dog’s Brain, by Vermont artist Stephen Huneck)
Posted by jwoestendiek February 2nd, 2009 under Muttsblog.
Tags: agile, alert, appearance, attentive, breeders, breeding, breeds, dogs, dumber, looks, my dog's brain, practices, purebreds, research, scientists, skills, standards, stephen huneck, stockholm university, sweden, swedish
Comments: none
Shooting your dog in Pennsylvania
A Pennsylvania appeals court ruled Friday that a state animal cruelty law is too vague and confusing to be used to prosecute people for shooting and killing their dogs or cats.
The Superior Court overturned the conviction of a northeastern Pennsylvania woman on conspiracy to commit cruelty to animals in the 2006 shooting outside Weissport of her 6-year-old pit bull-chow mix, named Bouta.
“If the Legislature wishes to make it criminal to shoot one’s own dog or cat, it must do so in a clear, unambiguous manner to give reasonable notice that the act is criminal,” wrote Judge Richard B. Klein for the majority. “It did not do so in this case.”
It was the second time in less than a year that the appeals court ruled in favor of Wendy Colleen Kneller of Carbon County, according to an Associated Press report. A decision last February was issued by only three judges, but the court agreed to hear it argued again and on Friday issued an 8-1 ruling.
The dissenting judge, Correale F. Stevens, wrote, “A sweeping policy conclusion that a dog owner can shoot a healthy, happy dog for no reason … would replace the call of ‘Lassie, come home’ with ‘Lassie, run for your life.”‘
The court said Kneller told a state trooper that the dog had bitten her child. Prosecutors said Kneller gave her boyfriend a .40-caliber handgun and told him to shoot the dog. Her lawyer, Paul Levy, said Friday that some people do not have the money to have their pets euthanized at an animal clinic.
Posted by jwoestendiek February 2nd, 2009 under Muttsblog.
Tags: criminal, dog, dog bite, dog law, dogs, euthanasia, lassie, law, legal, legislature, pennsylvania, ruling, run for your life, shooting, superior court, vague
Comments: none
















































