Since any breed is really a “sato”dog, in which many other types of genes have to be mix to develop a so called breed “which is categorized after an X number of generation of offsprings in which certain characteristics don’t change”. If a vague minded bill is pass against X phenotypical characteristics, regarding a myth with a correlation with aggressiveness. Then it will be a perfect example of an horrendous fault by the state, by the legislators, by the dog control department etc.. By which they assume that phenotypical characteristics are attached “ONLY” to traits that they can see. Which is false, they are attached to two type of gene expression. One that you can see phenotypical and one that you can’t see genotypical.
First to categorized a breed they should:
1. Do a DNA EXAM ($$$$)
-Since all breed are a mix of others breeds then all dogs are ”SATOS in plain spanish” which will make impossible to the state to categorized or differentiate a breed from another.
2. If they could find certain gene DNA sequences or tandems…?!
- Then the state will have to take each case separately and will have to base their findings for the use of that case along and only.
- Since each dog could have certain tandems or repeated DNA sequences called “CODIS”
( like the ones humans have, and FBI uses) still you can find DNA specific sequences in each animal (like your face, you can tell who is who in your family – DNA is the one responsible for this).
-Therefore the costs ($$) of the state in litigating this facts or findings will be exponentially incremented and it wouldn’t viably be cost effective, resulting in drop of charges.

My name is Charlie from PR, we are having the exact same problems on our beautiful Puerto Rico. Sadly the pit bulls have a bad reputation by people without knowledge playing “dog handling”. The above points i tried to highlight are based on my study grounds on DNA Recombinant MS.

Sorry, for all the errors in this post, I’m a native spanish talker, it’s 2:00am sleepy typing. Hope this helps everyone around here.
I will recommend the following:
To revise this facts described above you or any dog organization should raise money get a law firm and a professional who works in DNA RECOMBINANT, or GENETIC ENGINEERING field. He would be the key to win a case against the state wrongfully and bold dog specific law.