<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making the case for eating our dogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/11/02/making-the-case-for-eating-our-dogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/11/02/making-the-case-for-eating-our-dogs/</link>
	<description>a site for dog lovers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:03:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anne'n'Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/11/02/making-the-case-for-eating-our-dogs/comment-page-1/#comment-10248</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne'n'Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohmidog.com/?p=14338#comment-10248</guid>
		<description>Well, I find the thought of eating a dog (or cat or horse) physically revolting and doubt I could do it even if I were looking at starvation. I suspect there are any number of cultures and societies where people feel the same way. On the other hand, there are societies where any or all of these animals are consumed. We had a big to-do here about people from the Pacific Islands. 

I can&#039;t help wondering if we&#039;ve evolved somehow to feel this way about dogs. Over the long haul, they have been far more useful to us alive than dead--as guards, herders, hunters, and even burden-carriers such as sled dogs. And unlike some other animals, they tend to continue growing in usefulness as they can learn and develop experience even into their old age. Cattle are useful to us both alive (as beasts of burden and givers of milk) and dead, as meat. Same goes for sheep and chickens, which when alive provide wool or eggs, and when dead provide meat. I don&#039;t know what useful tasks pigs can perform aside from, maybe, sniffing out truffles. Horses were killed and eaten in many countries in Europe right up into the twentieth century.

I think what will serve us better than eating our pets is trying to find more sensible ways of raising and consuming the animals we do eat as meat. Our approach to rearing cattle is absurd--we feed them grain (which we could eat ourselves) when what they actually need to eat is grass, which we can&#039;t eat. Our chicken and pig farms, and our slaughterhouses, are barbaric in their cruelty. We&#039;ve turned the production of our meat animals into an industrial operation. It&#039;s wasteful, it&#039;s harmful, and it diminishes us as human beings. If these books can shock us into thinking and acting more sensibly, then maybe we should read them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I find the thought of eating a dog (or cat or horse) physically revolting and doubt I could do it even if I were looking at starvation. I suspect there are any number of cultures and societies where people feel the same way. On the other hand, there are societies where any or all of these animals are consumed. We had a big to-do here about people from the Pacific Islands. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help wondering if we&#8217;ve evolved somehow to feel this way about dogs. Over the long haul, they have been far more useful to us alive than dead&#8211;as guards, herders, hunters, and even burden-carriers such as sled dogs. And unlike some other animals, they tend to continue growing in usefulness as they can learn and develop experience even into their old age. Cattle are useful to us both alive (as beasts of burden and givers of milk) and dead, as meat. Same goes for sheep and chickens, which when alive provide wool or eggs, and when dead provide meat. I don&#8217;t know what useful tasks pigs can perform aside from, maybe, sniffing out truffles. Horses were killed and eaten in many countries in Europe right up into the twentieth century.</p>
<p>I think what will serve us better than eating our pets is trying to find more sensible ways of raising and consuming the animals we do eat as meat. Our approach to rearing cattle is absurd&#8211;we feed them grain (which we could eat ourselves) when what they actually need to eat is grass, which we can&#8217;t eat. Our chicken and pig farms, and our slaughterhouses, are barbaric in their cruelty. We&#8217;ve turned the production of our meat animals into an industrial operation. It&#8217;s wasteful, it&#8217;s harmful, and it diminishes us as human beings. If these books can shock us into thinking and acting more sensibly, then maybe we should read them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
