<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krupa hoopla: Catholics irked by PETA ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/12/04/krupa-hoopla-catholics-irked-by-racy-peta-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/12/04/krupa-hoopla-catholics-irked-by-racy-peta-ad/</link>
	<description>a site for dog lovers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:21:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne-n-Spencer</title>
		<link>http://www.ohmidog.com/2009/12/04/krupa-hoopla-catholics-irked-by-racy-peta-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-10633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne-n-Spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ohmidog.com/?p=15793#comment-10633</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d love to know who came up with this lamebrained idea. There are a lot of Catholics out there (well, there are a lot of Christians in general) to be offended by this. It stands to reason that they have a lot of companion animals, and that you&#039;d want them on your side in any sort of animal-welfare campaign you were working on. I don&#039;t much like it, and I&#039;m supposed to be disgustingly liberal. Why would PETA deliberately choose to alienate any interest group--religious, political, or other? Animal welfare is one area where people can (and probably do) unite regardless of their political, religious, or other beliefs. 

It&#039;s just one more reason to wonder what they&#039;re really up to at PETA. Apparently enlisting lots of supporters isn&#039;t it. While I think Mr. Donohue&#039;s statement about pet stores is a bit flawed, he does have a point: No pet store is actively offending potential customers. So why is PETA actively offending potential supporters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d love to know who came up with this lamebrained idea. There are a lot of Catholics out there (well, there are a lot of Christians in general) to be offended by this. It stands to reason that they have a lot of companion animals, and that you&#8217;d want them on your side in any sort of animal-welfare campaign you were working on. I don&#8217;t much like it, and I&#8217;m supposed to be disgustingly liberal. Why would PETA deliberately choose to alienate any interest group&#8211;religious, political, or other? Animal welfare is one area where people can (and probably do) unite regardless of their political, religious, or other beliefs. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just one more reason to wonder what they&#8217;re really up to at PETA. Apparently enlisting lots of supporters isn&#8217;t it. While I think Mr. Donohue&#8217;s statement about pet stores is a bit flawed, he does have a point: No pet store is actively offending potential customers. So why is PETA actively offending potential supporters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

