Comments on: Was this dog ready to protect our shores?

By: RANDTHINKS

RANDTHINKS — Sun, 02 Jan 2011 00:02:28 +0000

The reason there are no responses to my cisceral allegations and insights is because i served the overtaken companies SECURITAS appropriated, and now mismanages worse then before! I was a virtual work-horse for these companies, never took time off, remained flexible and dependable for duty-UNTIL THE COMPANY STARTED SCREWING WITH ME SURREPTITIOUSLY AND THE CLIENTS STARTED SCREWING WITH COMPLAINTS OVER SMALL STUFF-AND I WAS A STETSON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE AND MASTER AND OWNER OF ALL FIREARMS “YOU WISH YOU HAD”! I AM IN AUTHORITY UNMATCHED TO COMMENT-AND THE SHILL-DOG MANAGERS WHO SMILE-PROBABLY HAVE A L-O-T TO HIDE, OR JUST PLAIN TELL LIES. THIS IS A DOG-BARK COMPANY ALL UP AND DOWN THE NATION—-AND GETTING WORSE BY THE DAY!

By: RAND MAJESTIC

RAND MAJESTIC — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:23:23 +0000

When you try to defend the policies of an organization-you are putting blind trust in people you don;t really know-much less trust your life on assumption of variables! NEVER SMILE AT A CROCODILE—A LITTLE DITTY FROM “PETER PAN”…..

By: RAND MAJESTIC

RAND MAJESTIC — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 05:16:50 +0000

By the way,Mr. Kevin, what kind of faith and trust do employees have when company GENERAL MANAGERS have so little moral discretion as to be tail-whacking the secretary after hours—–you gonna trust his moral values-or say ‘That doesn’t make them inhumane to animals!”. MAYBE-MAYBE NOT—-but here is the rub, my “CAN DO NO WRONG FRIEND”—I wouldn’t trust my life or career on their indiscretion quirks! This was the crux of my briefing before a DEA Round-table that i PUT FORTH “THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF THESE OUTSOURCED COMPANIES DUE TO THEIR UNPROFESSIONAL DEMEANOR OF INDIVIDUALS IN MANAGEMENT THEREIN; AND HOW IT COULD COMPROMISE UNDERCOVER AGENTS PLACED IN INVESTIGATIONS”. “SECURITY IS LAUGHABLE, AND IT IS APPARENT BY MANAGERS WHO CARE ABOUT THEIR OWN PAYCHECKS– ONLY! ” I could go on-and-on—-but you know I am for real-and just because you landed in management in SECURITAS back when-you don’t have the education or insight, or experience, of the man chastising the veracity of your conclusion. Think about it-we do know what we are talking about!

By: RAND MAJESTIC

RAND MAJESTIC — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:36:07 +0000

Folks-let us get it real straight—The managements of these security companies (all the well-known names) are insulated and pampered-and not representative of the “WHACKING END” of these company’s policies!If you are trained, qualified, and educated—-you still could draw corrupt, uncaring, and dangerous-risk clients (NOEMI CAMPBELL COMES TO MIND-TAKING DIAMONDS FROM A BRUTAL DICTATOR-WTF DO THESE ELITE SNOTS USE FOR BRAINS?!),Imagine beloved SECURITAS sending you to protect that wench, and not advising you of her past and risk assessment!Bottom line is the bottom dollar-not your safety! NO RISK TO V.P KEVIN, OR HIS MINIONS! They C-A-R-E about dogs—he whines! NO-NOT LIKELY, KEVIN-THEY SHOW BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE WELFARE OF THEIR HUMAN EMPLOYEES—READ THE INTERNET BLOGS, “MR. MAN-WITH-HIS-HEAD-IN-THE-CLOUDS”! WISE UP PEOPLE-THESE SHILLS ARE THE MAJOR PROBLEM WITH THESE SECURITY ORGANIZATIONS. WRONG OPINIONS, WRONG CONCLUSIONS-AND I CAN SITE CHAPTER AND VERSE OF THIS UNSUPPORTED FRAUD–WANNA HAVE A GO AT THE FACTS, GUY?!

By: RAND MAJESTIC

RAND MAJESTIC — Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:18:51 +0000

KEVIN-LIFE AT THE TOP OF SECURITAS MUST BREATH RAREFIED ELITE AIR! NATIONWIDE, YOUR COMPANY YOU USED TO WORK FOR CHEATS AND BADGERS GUARDS UNMERCIFULLY, STUFFS THEIR FILES AND WON’T REVEAL THE REASONS, AND HAS FOLLOWED THE FORMAT THAT LED G4S WACKENHUT INTO DISREPUTE FOR CORRUPTION! I PUT MUCH THE SAME TIME INTO BOTH THE COMPANIES YOU TOUT—-WHAT THE H-E-L-L WERE T-O-U DRINKING AND SMOKING???( I WANT SOME OF IT!)

By: Kevin

Kevin — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:10:53 +0000

I worked for Securitas for several years as an Area VP, and prior to that, 12 years for Burns and I can say with with all honesty that the dogs were not abused by Securtas and something must of happened after the USN took posession. Knowing the corporate cuture and the leadership at Securitas, they would not of sood for the mistreatment of animals one iota. I don’t work for Securitas now, so I think I can give an informed unbiased opinion. It’s all too easy to jump on the contractor-someone needs to look at the government in particular, the navy..

By: laura

laura — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:14:35 +0000

That’s a shame. There are so many good, small organizations that could’ve used that money to grow their programs and properly train and take care of the dogs.

By: sarahkate

sarahkate — Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:08:48 +0000

I am so not surprised that Securitas is the company that did this. There have been more complaints against Securitas by private organizations such as malls which hire their so-called security guards – who turn out in many cases to be found to be convicted felons and who shoplift the very companies they are hired to protect, and complaints also about hyperaggressive tactics against shoppers, security guards drinking and drugging on the job, etc., etc. This sounds like a company that should itself be thoroughly investigated before more taxpayer dollars are forked over by the Navy for a service and “product” that are completely bogus and the “product” so abused and neglected. I have heard there is such a law theory as called “unclean hands” which I think means that if Securitas was providing untrained starved animals while demanding their millions, they aren’t entitled to that money.