Another “dog-friendliest” list falls flat

About four months ago, I gave Petside.com a hard time for choosing Dallas as the second-most dog friendly city in America — this just after the Big D bestowed the key to the city on Michael Vick.

My point — and I did have one — was that a city’s dog friendliness is, or should be, based on more than mathematical formulas that tally how many groomers, pet boutiques, veterinarians, etc., it has per capita.

Now, along comes Dog Fancy magazine with its picks — based on similar criteria — for the five dog-friendliest cities in 2011.

Among them: Santa Cruz, Calif., which for 33 years has banned dogs from part of its downtown area.

True, the ban — finally — has been lifted, conditionally, effective this week. And true, there are other very dog-friendly parts of Santa Cruz, including some beaches, and plenty of fine services as well. But a city that has banned dogs from its main drag for three decades being chosen as among the dog-friendliest in the nation?

Were I one of the other cities vying for the honor, I’d have a bone to pick with that.

The world’s most widely read dog magazine, as Dog Fancy calls itself, named Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, the winner of the 2011 DogTown USA competition, saluting it as America’s most dog-friendly city.

While we couldn’t agree more with Dog Fancy’s top choice last year — Provincetown, Mass., as we showed you during our travels, is indeed highly dog friendly — we have some trouble with this year’s selections.

The other three cities in the top five were Bend, Oregon; Knoxville, Tenn.; and Doylestown, Pa., where, earlier this month, a dog was found to have been given poisoned hot dogs and shot 32 times — allegedly by his owner, the golf course superintendent — while tied to fence of the Doylestown Country Club.

The acts of one deranged person shouldn’t blow a city’s chance at being proclaimed “dog-friendliest,” but we do think the number of animal cruelty cases that surface in a city should be a small part of any formula assessing dog friendliness.

The criteria used to select winners in the Dog Fancy contest — sponsored by Natural Balance Pet Foods and Wahl Clipper – include the amount of dog-friendly open spaces and dog parks, veterinarians, pet supply stores and other services, events celebrating dogs and their owners, and municipal laws that support and protect pets.

“Journalist Barbara Walters has saluted Coeur d’Alene as one of her favorite cities, calling it a little slice of heaven,” Dog Fancy Editor Ernie Slone said in announcing the results — though, Barbara being human, what the heck that has to do with anything I don’t know.

“What we discovered is that whether a dog likes a place to run and hike, loves to mingle downtown, or needs a new home, dogs and their owners have it made in Coeur d’Alene, a little slice of dog heaven.”

Slone traveled to Coeur d’Alene to present $5,000 to the Kootenai County Dog Park Association. Additionally, Natural Balance Pet Foods will donate 1,000 pet food meals to Kootenai Humane Society on behalf of Coeur d’Alene, and 500 pet food meals to each of the regional winners.

Given all that, I don’t want to totally disrespect these lists and the organizations that put them together, but I will suggest that they are not as much about truth or reality as they are about politics, public relations and sales.

Comments

Comment from smoketoomuch
Time August 24, 2011 at 2:21 pm

Santa Cruz “muni code”
No Smoking
No Dogs
No Alcohol

And people actually live there?! Thanks, I’ll pass.

Comment from DogEGlow
Time August 24, 2011 at 3:48 pm

You’re so right – what makes a town dog-friendly is much more than the number of pet businesses it boasts. The real question isn’t the availability of groomers and pet food stores, but how accepting “non-pet” establishments are of your pet. Can you and your dog sit on the patio at a cafe and go for a stroll downtown? And is this the case whether you have a pit bull or bichon?

In addition to animal cruelty, I’d also add breed-specific bans and shelter adoption/euthanasia rates!

Comment from Kolchak and Jodi
Time August 25, 2011 at 12:56 am

THANK YOU! we planned our vacation last year around one of these so called “friendliest cities” and we were surprised to find that dog’s weren’t welcome at restaurants – even on the patio, the “dog friendly parks” were on-leash only and our “dog friendly hotel” didn’tallow them in the main areas of the hotel or on the sun deck, which meant we spent our vacation hanging out in our room and taking the service elevators & exit. Coming from Vancouver, BC, Canada which is very dog friendly (like for real) it was a real let down!

Comment from Golden Rule
Time August 30, 2011 at 11:28 pm

I don’t understand all the negativity; have you been to Coeur d’Alene? Did you read the information submitted by CdA for the competition? Until you do then I don’t think you can judge how dog friendly CdA is or the decision made to name CdA Dog Town USA 2011. When I heard the presentation from Ernie Slone at the CdA City Council meeting, I understood the decision perfectly. Give Coeur d’Alene some credit for a job well done. They have taken dog friendly to a new level…for North Idaho. That’s what matters to the residents of Kootenai County.

Comment from jwoestendiek
Time August 31, 2011 at 8:03 am

Yes, I’ve been to Coeur d’Alene. So has my dog Ace. I hold no, and expressed no, negativity toward that fine town in this post. It quibbles with two of the other selections in the top five dog friendliest cities list, based on a three-decade long ban on dogs in one case, and heinous recent happenings involving a dog in another.
john/ ohmidog!

Write a comment