Dog-killing artist loses one contract


The San Francisco Arts Commission has terminated one of its two contracts with New York artist Tom Otterness after a public outcry from animal lovers enraged that the city would cut a deal with a man who, nearly 35 years ago,  killed a dog and called it art.

The commission yesterday voted to void its $750,000 contract with Otterness to create and install 59 bronze sculptures at Moscone station, part of the Central Subway project.

Otterness will still receive $700,000 for his sculpture, “Mother with Children,” at the new San Francisco General Hospital.

According to the San Francisco Examiner, the city has already paid the artist $365,750 for that unfinished sculpture and would lose the money if it terminated that contract.

“I think a prudent decision … is to penalize him pretty severely for the loss of this major, major creative as well as financial opportunity, but not penalize the San Francisco Department of Health and its hospital and not cost the city an extraordinary amount of money …” said Arts Commission chairman PJ Johnston.

One commissioner said she felt both contracts should have been terminated. ”It’s not about forgiveness. I respect his license to make such a piece, but I can’t stand behind it,” said Jessica Silverman, a local artist and gallery owner. “By approving such a thing you make it OK. And it’s not OK.”

Otterness procured a dog from an animal shelter  in 1977, tied it to a fence and shot it, turning the film footage into a work of “art” he called “Shot Dog Film.”

“I am disappointed they didn’t cancel both,” said Sally Stephens, chair of San Francisco’s Animal Control and Welfare Commission. “But at least we got the one.”

Stephens said the city should have terminated the hospital contract, even if it meant taking a loss.

“It’s the cost of (the Arts Commission) not doing their homework,” she said.

(Photo: “Large Sad Sphere,” a sculpture by Otterness that has been displayed in New York City parks)

Comments

Comment from smoketoomuch
Time November 17, 2011 at 1:14 pm

“Artist” is the wrong term of description to apply to this low-life. “Murderer” might be a better choice.
I don’t care who you are, killing a living thing is not Art, and there is no way to spin it as such.

Comment from Hanna Zukoski
Time November 18, 2011 at 5:01 pm

Rochester NY, The art gallery in Rochester has him commisioned for some work. So may people are upset but so far have been ignored. Lets get this dog killer out of work.

Comment from Laura
Time November 18, 2011 at 8:45 pm

He isn’t an artist just a criminal in front of all of us dog owners!!! What he did was wrong lowest thing to do to a dog!!! He should be punished and shunned from life as we know it!!!!

Comment from Julie Dunn
Time November 22, 2011 at 1:48 am

If I see his sculpture at SFGH, I will need to be admitted to the hospital since I will be that ill. How could our city of love and peace not only allow but reward such a sicko is beyond me. He has no heart, no compassion. Let’s fight this all the way folks, come on!

Comment from Elaine Santos
Time November 4, 2012 at 8:24 pm

This so called “artist” may not get his punishment on Earth,but I promise you ,someone is waiting for your dark dark soul when you demise,either way you will be punished.

Write a comment