Emulating Romney, protester gets nabbed
A protester emulating Mitt Romney’s dog-on-the-car-roof trick — but without a dog — was pulled over by police in Littleton, Colorado.
“Our 911 center received a call from a motorist who saw the car in the photo drive past, and she said the door to the animal carrier was open and a large white dog was in it,” Littleton city spokeswoman Kelli Narde said in an interview, reported on the Huffington Post.
Turns out the rooftop crate contained only a stuffed animal.
The unidentified motorist was re-enacting what the Republican presidential candidate did on a family vacation in 1983, when his crated dog, Seamus, rode on the roof of his car for 12 hours.
Resurgence of that tale led to the formation of a “Dogs Against Romney” protest movement/website.
When police received the call, a dispatcher radioed nearby officers, who spotted the car and pulled it over, finding only a stuffed animal in the cage. Police said the motorist was not cited for having a kennel on his car roof, but did get a ticket for failing to provide proof of insurance.
“We respect anyone’s right to support or oppose anyone’s candidate but when you pull a stunt like that and lead passersby to think there’s a live animal in there, it’s probably taking it too far,” Narde said.
Police didn’t identify the man by name, but Dogs Against Romney confirmed he was a “pack member” known on the Internet as “Oredigger.”
In a blog post Tuesday, Dogs Against Romney said the fact that motorist was pulled over “clearly illustrates how blatantly awful, incredibly dangerous, outrageously insensitive — and even illegal — Mitt Romney’s decision to transport his own dog on the roof of his car was.”
Posted by jwoestendiek February 9th, 2012 under Muttsblog.
Tags: animals, car, carrier, colorado, crate, dog, dogs, littleton, mitt romney, pets, police, protester, pulled over, romney, roof, rooftop, seamus, stopped




























































Comment from vida
Time February 10, 2012 at 8:05 pm
It’s not illegal if a rich pol does it, only when the general public does it. I think the protester had a good way to illustrate the point although keeping up with his insurance would have been a good idea .