http://www.ohmidog.com/2013/02/22/left-for-dead-bo-comes-back-from-the-ashes/ a site for dog lovers Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:41:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.ohmidog.com/2013/02/22/left-for-dead-bo-comes-back-from-the-ashes/comment-page-1/#comment-53036 TinaT Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:40:58 +0000 http://www.ohmidog.com/?p=46402#comment-53036 Wow. That is just AWFUL!! So glad Bo made it home and has recovered.

]]> http://www.ohmidog.com/2013/02/22/left-for-dead-bo-comes-back-from-the-ashes/comment-page-1/#comment-52760 Abby Fri, 22 Feb 2013 23:44:56 +0000 http://www.ohmidog.com/?p=46402#comment-52760 As Bo’s owner, I want to say yes, we know we should have kept him at home, however, he usually was always contained at our house. Gerber’s dog was at our house almost daily playing with our dogs, generally always under my supervision. Their dog was never mistreated. We understand they had the right to shoot and kill him if he was harassing livestock, however, burning him? That goes beyond just humanely killing an animal as allowed in the laws. They also did not burn him to prevent other animals from getting to him, they said in the police report that they panicked when they realized Bo was not a stray and burnt him. Bo was properly identified and we literally live 300 yards from each other. Bo barely crossed the fence if he was truly in their chicken pen as our property shares a fence. Its not a case of a dog roaming constantly. Also, Gerber’s have never seen Bo kill or harass any chickens. It is a lie that Bo has killed their chickens. As stated in the police report they claim to have seen him once (not harassing their chickens). This is not a case about shooting a dog, this is a case about burning a living dog. NO animal should ever have to experience this. Even as a person highly involved in agriculture, you don’t burn animals, especially live ones!

]]>