Was Samoyed poisoned at Westminster?
The handler of a prize-winning Samoyed suspects the dog might have been poisoned by animal rights activists during the Westminster Dog Show.
And, groundless as the accusations are, the New York Times saw fit to print them.
Cruz, a three-year-old Samoyed, died just a few days after competing at Westminster.
The New York Times calls it, “A whodunit that has rattled the show world and ignited tensions between animal activists and purebred-champion breeders.”
Why point the finger at animal rights rowdies for the death of Cruz?
Robert Chaffin, Cruz’s handler, says simply that they are the most likely suspects.
“Unfortunately, dog shows have been plagued by some of these people for years,” he said. “I’ve heard horror stories about other people’s dogs having their setups tampered with, being poisoned, but I never thought it would come to me.”
While animal rights groups have long protested dog shows, tampering with and poisoning canine contestants — a rare occurence — has traditionally more often been perpetrated by the human competitors, either out of jealousy or to better their chances to win.
Based on known facts so far, Cruz’s humans seem to be making a pretty big leap.
Chaffin accompanied Cruz to New York for the Westminster competition and says he paid close attention to everything the dog ate, including a steak he fed him the night before. Despite his monitoring, he said, “It would have been easy for someone to throw something in his cage.”
On top of that, Chaffin said he remembered a stranger at the Westminster show glaring at him and making a disapproving remark about Cruz having been debarked, a process in which a dog’s vocal cords are removed.
Chaffin admitted there was no evidence that Cruz had been deliberately poisoned, and no confirmation that poisoning was even the cause of death.
No necropsy was performed.
Lynette Blue, one of Cruz’s owners said she declined a necropsy because she was confident that he swallowed poison. Blue says she called New York City police after Cruz died to report possible foul play.
Cruz, 3, died on Feb. 16 in Lakewood, Colo., where he was competing in another show. He began vomiting blood, and Chaffin took him to Animal Critical Care and Emergency Services in Lakewood, where he was hooked up to an intravenous drip and received oxygen, but died shortly thereafter.
“We have been devastated and in shock,” Blue said. “This is one of the most painful experiences of my life.”
Molly Comiskey, the Colorado veterinarian who treated Cruz, said his symptoms resembled those of a poisoned dog, but that his cause of death remains unclear. She saw no reason to believe he’d been intentionally poisoned.
“Dogs are dogs. It’s not anyone’s fault. They eat stuff; they get into things; they make bad decisions,” she said.
The Times article points out the possibility that Cruz may have had an undiagnosed genetic disorder, but quotes Blue as saying he had no history of such. The lack of answers, it seems, is leading to some pretty wild speculation.
“We keep thinking of the various scenarios, and it’s starting to feel like something we may never know,” Blue said.
Given his owners passed on a chance to help solve what they see as a whodunit — namely, having a necrospy performed — that might very well be the case.
(Photo: Lynette Blue)
Posted by jwoestendiek February 28th, 2013 under Muttsblog.
Tags: activists, animal rights, animals, blamed, colorado, cruz, death, died, dog, dog shows, dogs, evidence, handler, lakewood, mouse poison, owners, pets, poison, poisoned, purebred, rat poison, robert chaffin, samoyed, suspected, westminster, westminster kennel club dog show, whodunit
Comments
Comment from Helen
Time February 28, 2013 at 8:31 pm
No necropsy???? First thing I would call for if my Sammy died suddenly.
Comment from Andrea
Time March 1, 2013 at 11:33 am
No necropsy – and just hypothesizing based upon symptoms? My Ch. bred dog was poisoned by the tainted rice gluten in food in 2007, & the necropsy we had done proved it – in black & white! Wouldn’t the owners of poor Cruz (who likely suffered, painfully) want toxicology results to know for sure what the cause was, if not to just identify presence of a toxic substance – or the possibility of a congenital anomaly in their breed line? Witnessing a dog go thru sudden renal (or other organs’) failure is devastating.
Comment from Miss_Marbles
Time March 2, 2013 at 10:49 am
I would NOT be surprised if animal rights fanatics did this, as they have done such things in the past as release show dogs from crates at shows. I KNOW this for a fact. Can you imagine your pet dog being released into a strange place? And yet the animal rights fanatics who did this left notes that they were “setting the dogs free.” Also, Peta has a sordid history of needlessly killing dogs in their shelters (see petakillsanimals.com for information). Some of their employees killed dogs BEFORE even bringing them to their shelter and then the bodies in a dumpster behind a supermarket. MANY animal rights fanatics have stated that owning pets is tantamount to owning slaves, and that pets are better off dead. Such people would have NO compunction about poisoning a show dog.


























































Comment from vida
Time February 28, 2013 at 7:08 pm
I’m very sorry the poor dog died but the owners using the death to stir up some hate is sad and disgusting. If I was going to go with groundless fact free finger pointing I’d be asking how much the dog was insured for and wondering why no necropsy.