After being thrown a bone, a homeless dog in China followed a team of long distance cyclists more than 1,100 miles over 24 days.
The little white dog followed the cyclists from Kangding in Sichuan province, to Lhasa in Tibet, China Daily reported.
The dog, nicknamed “Xiaosa” or “Little Sa,” began following the bicylists on May 4 after a Chinese college student on the trip gave it food — a chicken leg, according to some press accounts.
“So we fed her, and then she followed our team.”
A week later, Zhang and his buddies started a blog about the dog.
“We thought the dog was encouraging us, and wanted others to know its story,” he said.
Xiao Sa, a name created by combining xiao, meaning “little,” with the last syllable of Lhasa, followed the team along dirt roads and up and down mountains, even as some human members of the team dropped out.
“Many people stopped cycling in some sections, then took the bus, but the dog made it,” he said. On long dowhill stretches Zhang put the dog on the back of the bike.
Several of the cyclists said they wanted to take the dog home when the ride was complete.
Posted by jwoestendiek May 29th, 2012 under Muttsblog, videos.
Tags: adopted, animals, bicyclists, bicyles, china, cyclists, dog, dogs, followed, lhasa, little sa, long distance, pets, sa, sichuan province, stray, tibet, xiaosa, yajiang
Perhaps the most amazing thing about the photo above is not the story behind it (fawn follows beagle home, through the doggie door and into the house), but the number of brain hours that have been spent by so many dissecting, inspecting and pontificating about it.
Then it became one of those endlessly forwarded feel-good emails (the kind that always make me snarl); in my case, it was sent to me by my mother.
Thousands of people have had it end up in their emailboxes as well — the majority of whom, upon getting a warm and tingly feeling, passed it on.
But it’s also led to an endless Internet debate: Is it real or fake? These are a few of the comments posted on a Topix forum:
“In these days of ‘photo shopped’ pictures, it wouldn’t be hard to place the fawn on a sofa with the beagle…
“I think it’s fake. My son does a lot of photo shop work, and said that it’s not photo shopped. However, he did find a stuffed fawn, on line, identical to the one in the picture…”
“I am experienced with several different graphics programs including open Canvas, Photoshop, and Corel. I maximized this photo to its pixels and it clearly is not a fake picture…
“If you look at the picture you could tell by the ears of the fawn… they are shiny and bright pink… Looks like silk and sheesh don’t you think the fawn would get scared and run off or go nuts if it seen the dude??”
On and on the debate rages, including a comment from the purported sister of the purported photographer:
“It is a real dog, a real deer and a real photo. It’s my brother’s dog, my brother’s house and my brother’s couch. No fake. If you knew the beagle (“Rusty”) you would understand. Just a dumb, loveable beagle that loves to track (slow, but steady) rabbits but has probable never seen one. His only enemies in life are chimpmunks.”
I’m sure, if one looked hard enough, one would also be able to find a “chimpmunk” — that rare cross between chimpanzee and chipmunk — online, as well, but I’m worn out enough by researching the fawn and beagle.
I’ll leave it up to you, dear readers. Is the beagle legal? Is the fawn faux? Does it matter? Do you care? Or does it seem to you, like it does to me, that if one added up all the time people spend trying to run scams, and all the time other people trying to get to the bottom of them — both on the Internet and in real life — you would have a really, shall we say, elephantotamus amount of time that could be used for far better things?
(Photo: Deep Creek Times)